SAN FRANCISCO — When Pinterest went public in 2019, Christine Martinez’s buddies despatched congratulations. She had labored carefully with the founders of the digital pinboard in its earliest days, and her buddies thought she would get wealthy alongside them.
However as Pinterest’s inventory worth rose, turning its founders into billionaires, Ms. Martinez realized she wouldn’t be compensated or credited for her contributions, she mentioned.
On Monday, she sued.
In a lawsuit filed in Alameda County Superior Courtroom, Ms. Martinez accused Ben Silbermann and Paul Sciarra, two of Pinterest’s three co-founders, of breach of implied contract, concept theft, unjust enrichment and unfair enterprise practices. Ms. Martinez created Pinterest alongside Mr. Silbermann and Mr. Sciarra, the lawsuit mentioned, contributing concepts that had been “core organizing ideas,” reminiscent of organizing pictures on boards and enabling e-commerce.
Ms. Martinez, 40, was by no means formally employed by Pinterest, nor did she ask for a contract. She was not given inventory, although she mentioned Pinterest’s founders had verbally agreed to compensate her many instances.
Ms. Martinez argued that she and the founders had an implied contract, primarily based on their discussions. Pinterest even named a bit of its supply code after her, in accordance with the criticism. And he or she was such shut buddies with the co-founders that she introduced them each dwelling for Christmas and was a bridesmaid in Mr. Silbermann’s wedding ceremony.
“I all the time anticipated that once they might compensate me, they might,” she mentioned, including that she had been naïve. “There was by no means a doubt in my thoughts.”
A Pinterest spokeswoman mentioned in an announcement that Ms. Martinez’s allegations had been with out benefit and that the corporate would defend its place in courtroom. “We’re happy with what we constructed at Pinterest and respect all of the Pinners who’ve helped form the platform through the years,” she mentioned.
The lawsuit renews questions on whether or not Pinterest, which caters primarily to feminine customers, is hostile to girls and minorities in its office.
Final summer time, Ifeoma Ozoma and Aerica Shimizu Banks, two former Pinterest staff, wrote on Twitter in regards to the pay disparities, retaliation and sexist, racist feedback that they had skilled on the firm. Shortly after, Francoise Brougher, Pinterest’s former chief working officer, sued the corporate, claiming gender discrimination and retaliation.
In response, Pinterest staff staged a virtual walkout in August final yr, demanding that the corporate improve the variety of girls and minorities in its high ranks and supply extra transparency round promotion ranges, retention and pay.
In December, the corporate agreed to a $22.5 million settlement with Ms. Brougher, together with a $2.5 million donation towards charities for girls and underrepresented minorities in tech. Pinterest shareholders then sued the corporate and its board over its office tradition.
Ms. Ozoma has helped sponsor the Silenced No More Act in California, which is able to broaden safety of staff who converse out about discrimination or harassment at work. It was just lately handed by the State Legislature.
Ms. Martinez mentioned that she was not shocked to see the headlines about Pinterest’s tradition and that she had been annoyed by the disconnect between the corporate’s male founders and its feminine customers.
“I’ve spent a number of years being actually confused about how it’s that individuals consider that these three males created a product like this for girls — that they understood girls effectively sufficient,” she mentioned.
Beginning in 2008, the yr earlier than Pinterest was based, Mr. Silbermann and Mr. Sciarra sought Ms. Martinez’s recommendation on a variety of ideas, from its title and options to its advertising technique and product street map, in accordance with the lawsuit.
Ms. Martinez had studied inside design, created a way of life weblog and based LAMA Designs, an e-commerce start-up. Although LAMA’s enterprise mannequin labored and was displaying promise, enterprise capitalists didn’t take her critically, and he or she mentioned she had struggled to lift cash.
But funding for Pinterest, primarily based on little greater than an concept and Mr. Silbermann’s and Mr. Sciarra’s credentials, got here simpler. Ms. Martinez mentioned she was keen to assist her buddies.
“They’d no advertising background or experience in making a product for girls,” she mentioned. “My position was all the time to teach them.”
In line with the lawsuit, Ms. Martinez gave the co-founders the thought of organizing pictures on “boards,” a core function of the positioning; created its call-to-action phrase, “Pin it”; and established its primary classes together with dwelling décor, style and D.I.Y. She additionally helped Mr. Silbermann persuade high design and life-style bloggers to make use of Pinterest and put it on the market. She took him to conferences, gathered suggestions from the group and honed the pitch to them, she mentioned.
Ms. Martinez mentioned she realized she wouldn’t be compensated solely after Pinterest went public in 2019.
Quickly after, she mentioned, a loss of life within the household precipitated her to mirror on her life. That emboldened her to talk up about Pinterest.
“I couldn’t take this to my grave,” she mentioned.